These things may help to give the offender more of a personality, and thus help the police in their hunt for those who commit crime.
Offender Profiling although seen as a recent phenomena, and a phrase only coined in the 1970’s by the FBI, has in fact been used for many years, indeed it seems that it was used to look at the personality of Adolf Hitler during the second world war (for interview in case he was captured).
The psychiatrist, Walter Langer, actually predicted that Hitler’s likely response to defeat would be suicide.
Langer suggested that Hitler’s Mothers death from cancer had affected her son at a critical time, and had results in an inability to sustain intimate relationships, a belief in his own infallibility (i.e. perfection), and a determination to prove his masculinity.
In 1978 the FBI established a psychological profiling unit. Data produced from criminal investigations together with interview information from incarcerated offenders, child molestors and serial murderers (e.g. Charles Manson).
The aim was to identify the major personality characteristics of serious offenders and how they differed from non-offenders.
This work led the FBI officers to propose theoretical frameworks distinguishing between different types of offender, e.g. “organised” and “disorganised”.
|
Organised Offenders |
Disorganised Offenders |
|
Evidence of planning |
Spontaneous offence |
|
Victim targeted |
Victim or location known |
|
Victim personalised |
Victim depersonalised |
|
Controlled conversation |
Minimal conversation |
|
Crime scene reflects control |
Crime scene random or sloppy |
|
Victim submissive |
Sudden violence of victim |
|
Use of restraints |
Minimal use of restraints |
|
Aggressive acts prior to death |
Sexual acts after death |
|
Body Hidden |
Body left in view |
|
Weapon and evidence absent |
Weapon and evidence often present |
|
Organised |
Disorganised |
|
Above average IQ |
Lives alone, near to crime scene |
|
Socially and sexually competent |
Sexually and socially inadequate |
|
Usually living with partner |
Experiences serve forms of mental illness |
|
Experiencing anger / depression at the time of attack |
Physically or sexually abused in childhood |
|
Follows media coverage of the attack |
Frightened and confused at the time of attack. |
Top-down approach (FBI)
This is the approach developed by the FBI in the
Evidence from the crime scene is compared to patterns from previous crimes in order predict if nay more crimes are likely and when and where they might take place.
This is the approach used in the
People tend to act consistently in different situations (including crimes), so the way in which a crime was carried out can be used to predict how an offender ill act in other aspects of their life.
David Canter’s approach differs from the FBI in that he looks for ways in which the crime might mirror the behaviour of the offender in everyday life.
This is known as the criminal consistency hypothesis.
The idea that offenders, like all people, act consistently over time and indifferent situations.
Therefore, the way in which a crime is committed will reflect the everyday behaviour and traits of the offender.
The consistency hypothesis has been applied to two areas: